Why are Camcorders better for video than dslr cameras?

Question

I look at footage comparisons and most of the time the dslr video looks higher quality than the camcorders. What are the added benefits of a camcorder. And don't just say because they are made for it, I Would like a more specific answer as I am aware of that.

I have narrowed down the cameras I would like down to these 2 and Would appreciate your opinion on which is the best for video. But of course if you know of a better one, say. Thanks.

Pentax K-01
http://www.simplyelectronics.net/mainproduct.php?pid=18272&sd=cont
Canon EOS 550D Digital SLR Camera
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Canon-Digital-18-55-Lens-Kit/dp/B0037KM0F8

Answer 1

If DSLRs were better than actual camcorders for recording video, then actual camcorders would no longer be made. But guess what, camcorders are still made.

Answer 2

It's not true that a dedicated video camera is always better than a dSLR, it just depends on price point.



For example, any entry level dSLR will crush the video quality of a camcorder in the same price range. The large image sensor of a dSLR will just destroy it, especially in low light.



Even if you move up the chain to 1,000 - 1,500 US dollars it still holds true. You'll need to spend at least 3 thousand for a 3 chip camcorder, or a black magic cinema camera before things start to turn around and go the other way.



The time limit of first and second gen dSLRs was the result of heat issues. But that's no longer true. Now pretty much all the 2012 dSLRs and dSLTs have 29 minute time limits, and that's to avoid the tax that some cameras will get slapped with when imported to certain countries and for some it's a 4GB limit based on the codec being used.



Moving on, let's talk about the 2 cameras you have listed. Both good, each has its pros and cons, but the most important aspect of any camera, in my opinion is the image sensor. The K-01 uses a superior Sony image sensor. It's the 'sweet 16' that's killing everyone lately.



That image sensor is used in the Sony A580, Pentax K-5, Nikon D7000, Sony A57 the new Pentax K30 and it appears that the new Leica X2 uses it as well. The only downside to the mirrorless options like the Pentax you are looking at is that it loses the fast phase auto focus when shooting stills, so sports and fast moving things will be tougher to capture.



If' it's not your main focus, go for the pentax K-01, also look at the new K30, and the best for heavy video shooters hands down is Sony's A57, it can do things when shooting video that no Nikon or Canon can do, at any price.

Answer 3

Yes I agree dslr cameras do put out very high quality video - I know because I shoot with a Canon for video.



The only real short coming for a dslr camera - well there's too that come to mind. One is that dslr cameras create lots of heat in the sensor when recording so they're limited to about 12-minutes steady record time. That shouldn't be a big deal if you know how to shoot and edit because if you're shooting for the editor you'll not run over say 15-seconds per shot anyhow so that won't be an issue. However if you want to record say a lecture that will run 30-minutes a camcorder is the only choice.



I have noticed something with my dslr when I'm panning to follow action. At times it will skip frames as the camera tries (apparently) to catch up with the movement. It doesn't happen every time but once in a while and of course I really needed that shot but I don't have it.



If I was doing only video I'd use a camcorder, in the $2,500 range or up. But being a retired professional I don't need that gear now so I use my Canon dslr and after experimenting with it and learning about the panning issue, I know what to do and what not to do so I'm fine.

Answer 4

It really depends on your budget and what you intend to use it for.



If you were into amateur movie making, I would suggest a pricey camcorder. There are useful accessories, it is purpose-designed, making it easier to use for movie making, and you get the better experience.



However, if you just need to take nice videos once in a while, like on holiday or at a party, then DSLRs, and compacts have come a long way.



I use an itsy bitsy Canon Ixus that shoots in HD, and the videos are way better than an entry level Sony Handycam of technology 5 years prior.



I would go with the Canon. Better expandability.

Answer 5

There are lots of camcorders and just like still cameras, the quality of the video depends highly on the ability of the user. The camera is only a tool. For doing video, the camcorder is the right tool having more video controls than a dSLR.

Answer 6

Actually, DSLR cameras, at least those with CMOS sensors have a nasty distortion called Rolling Shutter Distortion. This distortion is most apparent when panning or shooting fast moving objects.



If you own a DSLR and do not know what rolling shutter distortion is, simply put your camera into video mode, then pan your camera left to right, and back to left rapidly. You will immediately see what the distortion is.



While this is easily fixed in post processing software, it is a pain to have to go an extra step.



Rolling Shutter distortion only affects cameras with CMOS sensors. CCD sensors (which most camcorders have) are immune.