Question:
How do I use my Nikon D90's macro mode?
kuzuryusen3
2009-08-16 23:02:38 UTC
I can't seem to figure out how to get my D90 into a macro mode. Does it even have one? I know a macro lens would be better, and I intend to get one once I save up enough, but for now, how do I activate (and then turn off) the macro mode?
Two answers:
EDWIN
2009-08-17 02:32:56 UTC
Apparently, you need to really READ & STUDY the Owner's Manual for your camera. Taking a couple of photography classes would really help.



These books will help you learn more about how to use your camera.



"Understanding Exposure" & "Understanding Shutter Speed", both by Bryan Petersen.



"Digital SLR Handbook" by John Freeman.



"The Art of Digital Photography" by Joseph Meehan.



"David Busch's Nikon D90 Guide" by David Busch. http://www.dbusch.com/



For long exposures you definitely need a tripod. You'll have to put your shutter in "B" (Bulb) which will then allow you to keep the shutter open as long as you want. However, you'll also need the Nikon MC-DC2 Remote Cord to hold the shutter open.



Here are a couple of sites that will help you with night sky photography.



http://www.danheller.com/star-trails



http://www.astropix.com
Felicia
2016-02-29 05:14:16 UTC
My camera is a Nikon D80, the previous generation to the D90. While I will not be upgrading my camera to a D90 any time soon (though maybe a higher model in a year or two), I will not be swayed to Canon any time soon. Between these two, it is really personal choice of what features you want and which feels better to you for holding and operating. Both handle exceptionally easily, though the D90 has a dedicated live view button (something Canon has not integrated on any current DSLR; perhaps on the 50D or the 5D Mark II). The only thing of what you listed that would tell me to recommend the D90 over the Rebel XSi would be the bad lighting. This is because Nikon's D90 is capable of using up to ISO 3200 (ISO 6400 with the boost). Not only that, but as it incorporates a lot of the technology from the D300, it does a great job of removing a lot of the noise (severely off-colour pixels) from the photographs shot at ISO 800 - 3200. The other things you ask for are dependent on the lenses you plan to purchase (though the bad lighting can also be helped along by certain lens specifications). That would be the reason why I will not be switching over to a Canon DSLR any time soon. While the lenses are of stellar quality, you do find some lenses that really just don't quite match up (such as the 18-55mm kit lens, I must say) to the quality of higher lenses. With Nikon, not only are the lenses generally of equal (or sometimes better) quality with Canon (again, noting that 18-55 kit lens), but many will also be significantly less expensive. Take for example the 70-200mm F2.8 IS/VR (IS from Canon, VR from Nikon... it's the anti-shake system). The price of that lens is $300 less from Nikon than it is from Canon, and on a crop-sensor camera such as the D90 or the XSi, the Nikon will actually outperform the Canon. The reverse of that last part would be true on a professional camera (Canon 5D or 1D Mark III, Nikon D700 or D3). I would recommend going in to the local camera store and actually handling both these cameras. If you like the feel, weight, and such of the Nikon, go for it. If you prefer the feel, weight, and such of the Canon, then go for that. Both will only perform as well as you ask them to in any given situation. As a side note, they are both at the 12 megapixel point. I fully realize there is that .x number of megapixels difference, but that is practically neglegible to be frank with you. Unless you absolutely need a faster frame-rate, the two will perform almost the same as far as a speed range.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...