Question:
digital or optical zoom?
Carrie F
2013-11-14 02:57:48 UTC
i am planning on buying a new camera but i am not sure on which kind to get do i get one with a big digital zoom or optical zoom i will be mostly using it for travel and for concerts so i need one that can give good images
Eight answers:
BriaR
2013-11-14 08:47:02 UTC
Optical zoom is the only zoom worth having.

Digital zoom just destroys image quality
?
2013-11-14 11:15:25 UTC
Hi,



Optical zoom will make objects appear closer without a reduction in picture quality. Digital zoom will zoom in further by increasing the size of the actual pixels from the centre outward, this reduces the picture resolution somewhat, especially when overdone.



For travel, you are going to want a wide angle lens for fantastic landscape shots, and also is able to do close-ups if you want to do nature based pictures. Or taking photos at concerts you want a very large optical zoom, so you can clearly see the band members on the photo, rather than blocky pimples in the background.



I'd would stay away from ultra compact cameras, and probably go for a bridge or entry level digital SLR.
?
2013-11-14 18:45:00 UTC
An optical zoom is by far the best. It brings things nearer by using the camera lenses; like when you look through a telescope or binoculars..

A Digital zoom just enlarges what's already there . Like when you tap a photo on your telephone screen to increase the size. The size gets bigger but the quality gets poorer.



The Lumix camera is quite OK. Personally I would go for the Canon SX 240HS. It is a solidly built camera which takes superb photos and has a large zoom. Amazon were selling it on special offer for about £140
Land-shark
2013-11-14 12:11:21 UTC
Digital zoom is just an enlargement of the centre of the screen really... the same as you can do in a photo editing program. It magnifies all the digital imperfections and lens distortions present.

Optical Zoom is the only quality zoom mechanism.



Travel often requires a wide angle because you usually cannot fit in architecture and mountains, and sometimes you just cannot step back further. You may like to have long telephoto length to crop distant objects to fill the frame... often animals and sports etc.

Concert photos when you're not on the listed photographers list and have to stay well back involves having a bright lens offereing good low-light abilities. The organizers may ban or confiscate professional cameras or megazoom compacts... it's because they don't want anyone other than their chosen photographers making any money out of it and also so that quality standards are maintained in news and promotional material.

Working out what your priorities are isn't easy. With concerts listed I think I'd want to start with a compact which had a bright lens and a good wide angle zoom lens.

For example: The Canon s120

http://www.dpreview.com/products/canon/compacts/canon_s120

or Nikon p330

http://www.dpreview.com/products/nikon/compacts/nikon_cpp330
Martin
2013-11-14 11:39:04 UTC
Optical zoom is the only thing that matters. Digital zoom is the same as cropping the picture afterwards. All it does is crop to the middle of the picture. That reduces image quality because you are only using the pixels in the middle of the picture.



Digital zoom is a completely pointless "feature" for any stills camera to have. It is marginally useful on a camcorder because it is harder to crop a video afterwards, but it still reduces image quality.



Forget the concerts. Any camera good enough to get good quality images in the low lights of a concert won't be allowed in.



The quality of the image is determined by sensor size and image quality. Any cheap compact will have a crappy small sensor. A DSLR or EVIL camera will be much better because of the larger sensor, but may not be what you are after for a travel camera, especially if you want it to be light weight.



Very long zooms tend to have rubbish image quality. Anything more than about 15x is worth avoiding if you care about distortion or vignetting or light falloff at the edges of the image. A lens with optical image stabilisation is worth paying extra for.



What sort of budget do you have in mind?



EDIT - I've got a Panasonic TZ-25 which is my backup camera. It's a good choice for travel. It is lightweight, well built, has enough zoom for most purposes, quite a good wideangle and reacts quite quickly. The lens is good (comes from Leica). Pictures are pretty good for a compact and they don't try to cram too many pixels onto the small sensor. It's not suitable if you plan on getting it wet or sandy.



The TZ-25 battery is a bit small and weedy so I keep a spare charged and ready to go. The spare battery was a cheap third party one from Amazon but it works well. I use a Sandisk Ultra 16GB SDHC card in it. That's quick and again reasonably priced at Amazon.



The TZ-25 is no better or worse than any other cheap-ish compact for concerts. It's not great at high ISO, but you won't find one that is. You can turn the flash off and it's small enough to get past the guards on the doors, so that's okay. There's plenty of manual control if you want to get into photography, but there's also a lot of useful scene modes. I was quite impressed with how well the sunset mode worked, which is nice on holiday!



EDIT 2 - The tz-25 is available for £117 at Argos at the moment: http://www.argos.co.uk/static/Search/searchTerms/5598964.htm

Add in a couple of 16GB class 10 Sandisk Ultra SDHC cards at £10 each: http://www.amazon.co.uk/SanDisk-SDSDU-016G-U46-Sandisk-Ultra-SDHC/dp/B007BJHETS/

Then add a spare battery for £9: http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B002AMP3Y4/

and you've got a decent camera kit for under £150.

(Note: There are cheaper spare batteries, but most get mixed or bad reviews).



If you want a case for the tz-25 as well take a look at the Lowepro Apex 30 AW, which might look expensive at £20, but it has an inbuilt rain jacket which goes around the case as well as plenty of padding and a pocket for the memory card. There is just enough room for camera, battery and spare card.
anonymous
2013-11-14 11:42:44 UTC
It's always best to at the very least get an idea of what the different cameras are capable of before buying one...you could try reading through a photography guide book in your local library for really good information.



You haven't given any idea of your 'spending power' or much insight into how interested you are in photography...For decent quality images at a 'concert' you would need a DSLR camera and they aren't allowed into 'venues' by security staff...any other camera 'compact', 'bridge' etc isn't going to get you anything worthwhile to justify the hassle of carrying it...unless you are in a good position near the stage or band.



Optical Zoom is always preferred over Digital Zoom...to be honest work out how much you can afford and pop into a local camera store and 'bounce' your thoughts off a sales assistant...the size of the sensor in a camera is important...though, depending on what you expect and how you intend to use your images you might not need a sensor that is larger than what is available in compact or bridge cameras...best to talk it over with a salesman or read up about it.
anonymous
2013-11-14 16:38:22 UTC
For simplicity sake pay attention to "optical" .. That way you can easily relate the figure to 35mm film, which us "old timers" can immediately relate to.

The Panasonic is good, but I like the new Pentax X5 with its 26x (or 22mm-580mm) zoom lens selling @ $227.00 here in the USA. However,most reatilers like amazon sell it cheaper! The Pentax, incidently, just came out!



Good Luck!
Sordenhiemer
2013-11-14 11:10:01 UTC
Optical zoom is better.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...