Question:
What's the best camera for taking both videos and stills?
anonymous
2009-10-16 21:36:40 UTC
I want a camera under 300 bucks fthat will take decent videos and clear stills... right now i've got a Fujifilm FinePix A820 and I want something that will take clearer videos than that.
Six answers:
anonymous
2009-10-16 22:51:52 UTC
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 10MP Digital Camera with 12x Wide Angle MEGA Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 3 inch LCD (Black)

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001QFZMCO?tag=amazonbestdeal09-20





Review:

I have owned two prior digital cameras- the first was a Canon that took good pictures, but was too bulky to pocket around and required AA batteries to power it. The second was a Sony CyberShot DSC-W150 that took crappy, blurry pictures in low light. Needless to say, I felt an upgrade was in order.



So I'm going on an east coast trip next month. My buddy and I are avid baseball fans. One problem: as we do not always have great seats, taking close-up pictures of ballplayers is a real pain with 99% of the compact point and shoots out there. This is because the camera's size will only allow it 5X optical zoom. You can combine this with digital zooming, but I don't need to tell you how terrible and pixilated this looks. Thus my conundrum. So I really wanted a compact, pocketable camera with a long range optical lens, without having to lug around an expensive digital SLR.



Enter the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3. When I read the specs on it, I was in awe. 10 megapixel, 12X OPTICAL zoom. Here's the sweetest part about the zoom- if you planning to use smaller prints (i.e. 4X6), you can quickly adjust the camera's Megapixel (MP) count from 10 to 7, 5, and 3 to yield maximum OPTICAL zooms of 14.3, 17.1, and 21.4 respectably, without much loss of detail on such prints. I wish Panasonic would have allowed the camera to adjust the MP count automatically as you zoom, but it's not too much trouble to change the MP settings manually from the quick menu.



Another great feature: the camera's screen is beautiful at 460,000 pixels, twice the count as the rival Canon Powershot SX200 IS (more on that camera later). From the moment you view your first picture, you'll quickly notice how much sharper photos look on this camera. It's a nice convenience to view photos on the camera in a manner closer to the quality that will actually be seen when you're viewing them on the computer (and ultimately printing them).



I also want to give Panasonic kudos for the build quality and compactness of this camera. The ZS3 is a replacement for the popular TZ5 model, which was 9MP and 10X Optical Zoom. So they increased the resolution, and added a wider range lens, and REDUCED the size by .4 cubic inches. Specifications aside, I was more than pleased that this camera will comfortably fit inside my jeans pocket. It's a bit bulkier than an ultracompact for sure, but not objectionably so. Note that the SX200 is a full 2.0 cubic inches thicker, another reason I passed on the Canon. Here's a few more reasons the Canon falls short: the Canon has a cheesy looking popup flash that sticks out at the top of the camera, whether you're using flash or not (bad design decision). It has less rated battery life than the Lumix. Also, when shooting video, the Canon does NOT allow you to use optical zooming.



Photo quality on the Lumix is excellent, although I've only snapped samples around my place so far. However, I've taken quite a few pictures at low light, and at maximum zoom levels to try to get a bad shot. So far, there's none to be found. I'll put this through its paces more when I travel next month, but I'm extremely pleased so far. As for video shooting, I've sampled it a bit, and it seems pretty solid. The camera gives you the choice of shooting video in its touted AVCHD Lite format (ideal for watching it on your TV in HD with an optional mini to standard HDMI cable), or JPEG if you prefer to email video clips to friends. This year's model also added stereo sound on video playback versus last year's monaural effort. One thing I found a bit strange, was the incredibly slow zooming when shooting video. I guess Panasonic was trying to give the user a more controlled, deliberate zoom, but unlike the snappy photo zooming, it's a bit slow for my liking.



Some other minor quibbles: The dial that controls the shooting mode is extremely loose. If you lightly rub it against anything (a camera bag, your pocket), there's a good chance it will shift. When you turn the camera on, it will digitally tell you what mode you're in, but it's still annoying when it happens by accident. Second, when making a quick zoom on an object, it will appear blurry on the camera's screen until the shutter button is pressed. There are modes to continually focus the object when zooming, but this drains the camera's battery life more rapidly. It would be nice if this feature was incorporated automatically without any such sacrifice.



Also, I'm not a huge fan of the included PhotofunStudio software bundled with this camera, as there are other, more compelling programs to view, edit, and print photos (I like Canon's Zoombrowser program better). Finally, this is not the camera to buy if you're into manual controls. There's a ton of preset scenes that can be used (nighttime, por
?
2016-09-21 02:26:51 UTC
i am not a legit photographer nor a digicam nut. my solutions are simply suggestions established on my revel in among my camcorder and my digicam for the reason that i've each. your alternative is determined by the first-class of the video and photographs that you just desire. such a lot camcorders takes nonetheless pictures however the first-class of the photographs are restrained to a few mega-pixels. for such a lot programs, that's ample. taking movies with a virtual digicam then again offers you the uneven Mpeg style first-class that is nowhere close that of a video taken by way of a camcorder. additionally, maintain in brain that if you're going to shoot a video with a virtual digicam, you might absolutely need to get a greater reminiscence card with a view to shoot lenghty movies. a different characteristic of a camcorder is the automatic video stabilizer that the majority virtual cameras lack. i individually might advocate a Sony camcorder. such a lot in their prime finish camcorders at the moment are approximately the equal dimension as the brand new virtual cameras being bought at present (if dimension is even an hindrance) and at approximately the equal fee because the better finish virtual cameras.
duke_of_gotham
2009-10-16 22:43:09 UTC
For 250 dollars, I'll recommend the Kodak Zi8 with a 32g SD card and case/tripod.from Target or Bestbuy. HD video in 1080p, 720p, WVGA and photo stills at 5mp. Make sure you have firmware 1.05 installed for smoother zoom.
anonymous
2009-10-16 22:35:16 UTC
I would recommend Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 10MP with 12x Wide Angle MEGA Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 3 inch LCD.It take great picture and also take good HD video in in "AVCHD Lite" format

allows longer recordings with breathtaking HD visual and audio quality.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001QFZMCO?ie=UTF8&tag=computer0bd-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B001QFZMCO
anonymous
2009-10-17 00:48:38 UTC
Answer is the samsung wb550

i got one a few weeks ago and its incredible
anonymous
2013-10-01 11:15:47 UTC
See nicest Video 4 from here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QriWAmC6_40



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vBn7qjb3HQ



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3eQHP2d2s4



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvfCMUsBiOk



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QriWAmC6_40


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...