Question:
Does a 16 mp camera a 12 mp camera make much of a difference.?
?
2011-08-17 11:40:45 UTC
I don't know if I should get a 16 mp camera or a 12 mp camera. I'm not going to blow it up. The biggest it would be is the screen of my 21.5 inch mac. Which should I get?
Eight answers:
?
2011-08-17 12:32:07 UTC
What lens, how big is the sensor, what technology behind the sensor?



See with MP alone as factor you get nowhere. A camera is allot more then an amount of pixels. It has light meters, glass parts, moving parts to focus and zoom, chips with programs to change the signal data of the sensor into a digital file and write it away and so on....



Not to mention usually more megapixels if the rest says equal means worse quality.



For instance DSLR's have a much bigger sensor then compact cameras and yes even superzooms. This means that on those sensors the pixels, the light recieving sensors, are nice and big.



On a smaller sensor with an equal amount of pixels the pixels have to be smaller. Smaller pixels have a harder time capturing all the photons and are earlier "full" aka a harsh white value. Also with so much packed on such a small area the electronic influence over each other gets worse, noise happens.. and image quality gets worse.



So when you have a 12Mpixels DSLR and next to it a 12Mpixel superzoom they might look the same, but the DSLR makes better quality images, well looks wise. The colors remain better, the dynamics between shadow and light are better. The true quality of the picture is what the photographer has to make from it, only he or she decides when the picture and how the picture is taken after all ;)
AWBoater
2011-08-17 18:12:45 UTC
Not much difference at all - well perhaps.



You need to double the pixel count for the image to be noticeably better.



But the higher pixel count in a compact camera could result in a worse photo in low light conditions - which isn't all that great anyway.



And the shutter lag tends to be worse on some higher Mp count cameras.



So here is one time when perhaps the 16 MP camera has worse performance.



I have 4 different compact cameras; a 10Mp, 12Mp, and two 14Mp. Without question the two 14Mp cameras are worse performers in optical clarity and shutter delay than the other two, and oddly enough, the 10Mp camera is the best. The 14Mp camera is also a waterproof camera, so perhaps the optical clarity issues have something to do with that as well.



The bottom line is that I am not all that impressed with the 14Mp waterproof camera.



http://www.althephoto.com
thankyoumaskedman
2011-08-17 11:59:08 UTC
The difference in the amount of detail is small. With a compact camera more can be worse because of the high pixel density. The 16 MP sensor may capture a little bit more high contrast detail, but to compensate for noise more low contrast detail is smudged away. This gets worse as ISO is increased as seen here:

http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_PowerShot_SX230_HS/high_ISO_noise.shtml
JBREEZE
2014-10-03 10:27:54 UTC
I have the Canon SX50(12 MP-50x zoom). I'm considering getting the Canon SX60(16.1 MP-65x zoom). The SX50 works for shooting birds. Is the 16.1 MP going to make a big difference? Is it worth upgrading. Sometimes you give up something when switching?
Jim A
2011-08-17 11:44:17 UTC
I agree especially in compact cameras - no difference as displayed on a computer screen. Since you're not going to enlarge prints then go for the 12.
?
2011-08-17 12:26:15 UTC
It doesn't matter, only if you bought one of the super zoom camera you must get the 16 mp .. Cause at the highest zoom range it would matter in the quilety ...

Hope i helped ...
?
2011-08-17 11:42:53 UTC
You get what you pay for. Not much of a difference in quality.
Vinegar Taster
2011-08-17 11:49:11 UTC
It won't matter, but what camera you buy will.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...