Question:
Sony SLT a65, is it any good?
anonymous
2011-11-30 23:22:47 UTC
So i have changed my price range a lil bit and i really love sony, all i was wondering is... is it a good camera? :) thanks
Four answers:
?
2011-12-01 00:07:32 UTC
Sure. After all you got the megapixels and the framerate to impress your friends. Never mind the electronic viewfinder, horrible battery life, mediocre lens lineup or non-standard (and rather iffy) hotshoe-flash system
?
2011-12-01 07:09:45 UTC
The camera is no better than the photographer, no matter what the majority on here think. The A65 is actually a great camera, but since it is made by Sony, the Canon and Nikon fanbois will tell you it is not.



Sony actually tends to have the most bang for your buck at any price level. The hot shoe (questionable? in what way?) issue is not actually an issue. The fact that there are not 60 lenses in the lineup is also a non-issue... if you take out the crap low end stuff from the Canon or Nikon lines, things are much closer.



You will also find that in print, you can't tell what camera took the picture. It shouldn't matter. My wedding clients never asked, and I never told them. All I told them was digital, because that is all that matters. The fact that I used Sony gear to shoot weddings was irrelevant, it was the results that mattered.



In the end, buy what you want... and don't worry about the opinions of others that have almost certainly never even touched the gear, just bad mouth it out of habit.
?
2011-12-01 02:48:35 UTC
Although few people know this, Sony invented the world's first non-film interchangeable lens SLR - the Mavica - back in 1981. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Mavica No, it wasn't digital but it didn't use film.



Just a few short years ago many DSLR "purists" were vehemently opposed to the introduction of a feature called Live View. Once that feature became a standard on DSLR cameras they turned their attention to demeaning DSLR cameras with Video capability. As Nikon quickly found out when they introduced the D3000 without those features, consumers weren't buying a DSLR without them. Hence the quick replacement for the D3000 - the D3100. Now their attention has been turned to the EVF - Electronic ViewFinder. Funny, but few complain about the EVF on the mirror-less cameras from Sony, Olympus, Panasonic and now Nikon and Pentax but mention "DSLR" and "EVF" in the same sentence and the Sony SLT series of DSLR cameras using an EVF comes under harsh criticism.



Completely overlooked are the advantages of Sony's Translucent Mirror Technology, one of which is its ability to allow full-time continuous phase-detect auto focus whether you're shooting still pictures or full 1080p video. Of course, eliminating the bulky pentaprism assembly and the mechanism that moves the mirror up and down in a traditional optical viewfinder DSLR is seldom mentioned.



As far as Sony's lens line up, while it may not be as extensive as shown in a Nikon or Canon catalog, most critics seem unaware that all Sony DSLR cameras use the legacy Minolta Maxxum "A" lens mount that was first introduced in 1985. This allows the owner of the Sony SLT A65 access to a vast selection of previously owned Minolta Maxxum AF lenses. Since Sony wisely includes a focusing motor in all their DSLR cameras a Maxxum AF 70-210mm f4 zoom lens will auto focus on the A65 as well as on any other Sony DSLR. Nikon can't say that about any of their DSLR models below the D90 or D7000. The Nikon D40, D40x, D60, D3000, D3100, D5000 and D5100 all require use of Nikon's more expensive AF-S lenses for auto focus on those models. So although the owner of one of the entry-level Nikons can use the less expensive Nikon AF lenses they will have to manually focus them. Canon changed their lens mount from the "FD" to the "EF" in 1988 so their backwards lens compatibility ends there.



Suppose you need more zoom than offered by the usual 18-55mm kit lens but you aren't made of money. Canon has a 70-200mm f4L IS USM zoom that retails for $1,331.00 (from B&H and after a $150.00 Instant Savings that ends 1-7-2012). Nikon only shows a 70-200mm f2.8 VR zoom that retails for $2,396.95 (from B&H) although a 70-200mm f4 zoom has been rumored and will probably be priced close to the Canon 70-200mm f4L. On eBay, offered by several Top Rated sellers, you can buy the Maxxum AF 70-210mm f4 "Beercan" zoom for under $200.00. Of course the Maxxum 70-210mm f4 isn't a stabilized lens like the Canon or Nikon but it doesn't have to be - Sony has their version of Image Stabilization in the camera body so any lens used becomes, in effect, a stabilized lens.



NOTE: I own and use the older manual focus version of the Maxxum AF 70-210mm f4 lens. Internally they are identical and you'll find the lens to be very sharp across the entire zoom range. The manual focus version was actually sold by Leica for their 35mm SLR cameras. My 70-210mm f4 is my choice for general purpose photography outdoors unless I'm photographing a festival or event and then I often use my 28-85mm f3.5-5.6 zoom. For landscapes I use either my 21mm or 24mm prime lenses.



You'll find comparable savings if you decide you'd like a 50mm f1.4 lens for portraits or available light photography with your A65. Of course it will be a stabilized lens on your A65. Nikon and Canon don't offer a stabilized 50mm f1.4 lens.



In my opinion you should go ahead and purchase the A65.



Review:



http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA65/AA65A.HTM



B&H - http://www.bhphotovideo.com
vashistha pathak
2011-12-01 04:22:28 UTC
Sony A65 is better than the Canon 600D and Nikon D5100, See specification comparison review here http://thenewcamera.com/?p=6526


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...