Question:
Whats the better camera?
Duderoni
2010-07-21 21:24:25 UTC
What is the difference here
Canon EOS 7D 18MP Digital SLR Camera With 18-135mm IS Lens Kit

http://www.bestbuy.ca/en-CA/product/canon-canon-eos-7d-18mp-digital-slr-camera-with-18-135mm-is-lens-kit-7d/10130566.aspx?path=0260ef7435c62266c652aec2bd8a7eaben02

or Rebel 18MP
http://www.bestbuy.ca/en-CA/product/canon-canon-eos-rebel-t2i-18-0mp-dslr-camera-with-18-55mm-is-lens-kit-t2i/10139993.aspx?path=25b15c65ee4a4f4f92497e16772c12f2en02

$1000 price difference
why?
Eight answers:
mister-damus
2010-07-22 15:25:23 UTC
The build quality of the first camera is probably better (meaning better materials and better workmanship). That does not mean it takes better pictures necessarily (that is up to the photographer).



It's like a car. The build quality in a mercedes is probably better than a hyundai - but that doesn't mean that the hyundai won't do what you want it to do (it will get you to work and back home the same way as the mercedes will, for a lot cheaper).





However, there are a few notable things that makes the first one better:

1. Better maximum burst rate (the number of pics it can store one after the other until the camera locks up). 34 versus 96 on the rebel and 7D, respectively

2. The 7D can shoot both RAW and JPEG at the same time (the rebel cannot).

3. The 7D can use both CF cards and MD cards (this is not a big deal for most people)

4. The 7D has max 1/8000 of a second shutter whereas the rebel only has 1/4000 (this is not big deal for most people as 1/4000 is more than fast enough).

5. The 7D has a slightly higher flash sync speed than the rebel (not a big deal IMHO), but it might make a difference in certain circumstances.



If you try reading the specs you'll see.
Inspired by Tech
2010-07-24 17:01:33 UTC
Canon EOS Rebel T2i

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0035FZJHQ?ie=UTF8&tag=0610-20



(+)18.0-megapixel CMOS (APS-C) sensor; DIGIC 4 image processor for high image quality and speed

(+)Kit includes 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens

(+)ISO 100-6400 (expandable to 12800) for shooting from bright to dim light; enhanced 63-zone, (+)Dual-layer metering system

(+)Improved EOS Movie mode with manual exposure control and expanded recording 1920 x 1080 (Full HD)

(+)Wide 3.0-inch Clear View LCD monitor; dedicated Live View/Movie shooting button

(+)New compatibility with SDXC memory cards, plus new menu status indicator for Eye-Fi support



Review: Pros:



1. Superb image quality in both photos and video.

You can expect image quality comparable to a Canon Pro DSLR.

And I am not just saying that. I actually did compare it to our 1Ds MkII.

This camera can produces usable images up to ISO 3200. Noise is there but they

do a good job of controlling it. With this said, it would be noted that there

really isn't that much difference between a Canon 20D and the most expensive DSLR

for photos that will be displayed on the web or in regular size prints.

If you don't really need video then you can save yourself a lot of money and just

get a used 20D :) I actually still have my original 20D as a backup.



2. Amazingly, the 18-55 kit lens turned out to be remarkably good. How good?

Well, within the center area of the frame it would give the more expensive lens a run for their money :)

Where it begins to break down is in corner detail but this is to be expected.

The focusing is also too noisy to use for video, IF you are recording sound.



UPDATE: if you are looking to upgrade the lens, I can recommended the Canon 15-85 IS.



3. The built in mic is also very good. Even on regular video cameras this is almost a universal weakness.

If you are looking for a better mic I can recommend the Rode SVM Stereo Video Mic.

Works very well with this camera, unlike the Audio Technica 24CM. Its not cheap but good mics never are.

On all of these cameras hiss is a problem to varying degrees especially when recording in a quiet environment.

The quiter the source the more you will hear it. The only way to get remove it is to use an external audio

record like the Zoom H4N or do it in software with something like SoundSoap.



4. Light weight compared to the higher end Canon bodies.



5. Amazing low light video capability. With a fast lens f2.8 or lower even a Pro video camera can't touch it.

So if shooting in dark places is a big requirement then these cameras are the way to go.



Cons:



1. This is my biggest problem. I personally find the small body a lot more difficult to handle than the larger

Canon cameras we have. Maybe I am just use to the larger bodies but they are a lot more natural and easier

to work with. If you shoot pro or semi pro get the 7D just for this reason. The battery grip will help.

I have small hands so I hate to think how it would feel with someone that has large hands. I would highly recommend

you go somewhere and play with the T2i just to see how it feels in your hands.
Steven D
2010-07-22 05:16:05 UTC
A professional at a class I took answered this by saying "buy the lower camera and spend the $1000 you saved on a good "glass" (lens)"
?
2010-07-22 04:31:34 UTC
Well the first one has a stabilized lens to start off. And also has a lithium battery. I couldn't find anything to my knowlege of cameras that would be worth $1000 in the difference. Both would take beautiful pictures.
?
2010-07-22 08:02:55 UTC
the 7D has a top LCD and a magnesium alloy body.
MP
2010-07-22 05:53:24 UTC
Same question was asked here:



https://answersrip.com/question/index?qid=20100404163413AApaoz5
2010-07-22 09:23:24 UTC
second one camera is good.
baby
2010-07-22 07:51:56 UTC
second one is good camera.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...