Question:
How Come Still Image Cameras Don't Use Bitmap BMP?
BBjoe
2009-04-26 20:08:20 UTC
How Come Still Image Cameras Don't Use Bitmap BMP?

Cause it appears to me that Bitmap is a ReNewable Format or LossLess.

Where as Mpeg Video is LossLess.
Four answers:
Paul R - Dipping my toe back in
2009-04-27 02:08:11 UTC
There are a few reasons:



Colour depth as well explained above, but also things like colour space (i.e. using a colour profile such as sRGB or Adobe RGB)



The popular formats such as TIFF, JPEG and RAW also support EXIF file information, so when you get back to your PC you can review settings to see what worked etc.



If you shoot in RAW mode (where the camera provides it) then you also have the option to post-process white balance and exposure,which can be really useful.



Formats like JPEG & RAW are very efficient at compressing and saving file size, BMP is not as readily suitable for such compression, when you have cameras generating 10 megapixels worth of information it is good to be as efficient as possible.
qrk
2009-04-27 04:12:44 UTC
Wow, you're all over the map! Thus, I'll give you a response that's all over the map....



Anyone serious about photographic images will use JPEG (great for everyday stuff), TIFF (used in the printing industry and doing special image processing like HDRI or panos), DNG (digital negative), or RAW (camera manufacturer specific format) formats. BMP is too limited. BMP format is limited to 32 bits per pixel which falls short for people trying to do high quality work which is 36 to 48 bits per pixel. If you want good quality, many cameras support RAW format. RAW format is either lossless or has mild compression. The DSLR camera RAW formats are generally 36-bits per pixel, although, the better cameras are 42-bits per pixel. Some cameras will also create TIFF files formats.



MPEG is used for video, not still images. MPEG variants are compressed formats, thus they are lossy.



Microsoft paint is only a rudimentary image editor. You would only use that to do simple editing tasks and nobody doing commercial work would dare use a Microsoft image editing product (crap-ware). Anyone serious about their work will use image editors like Photoshop. Photoshop has a wonderful RAW image editor. Casual users will use programs like Picasa (free) or Irfanview (free) to do rudimentary editing. Many casual users like Photoshop Elements ($100) which is a very nice editing package for the money.



For everyday shooting, JPEG is a great format which produces good image quality and relatively small file sizes and you can do minor editing. If you need to edit your images a lot, then you would use RAW format and use Photoshop's RAW image editor.
Little Pooky
2009-04-27 03:21:24 UTC
You said BMP v.s. Mpeg.



Mpeg is video. Not for still photo.



Did you mean "why not BMP instead of JPG?"



Who knows. I shoot only in RAW (Canon) and convert to DNG (Adobe Digital Negative). So I am afraid this is not an answer you were looking for.
Jim A
2009-04-27 04:04:37 UTC
As far as I know .jpg (not mpg becasue that's video) is a world standard that virtually any computer software understands - make sense?


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...